It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 7:55 pm
Login
Home
Products
Videos & Demos
Overview
Product Comparison Chart
Full Flow Design Suite
Front End Tools
Back End Tools
Layout Acceleration
Physical Verification
Parasitic Extraction
MEMS
Specialty Tools
Customers
Case Studies
Featured Customers
Quotes
Foundries
Support
Training
Latest Version
Support Cases
FAQ
Login
Press Room
Press Releases
Events
Videos
In the News
Company
Overview
Fact Sheet
Team
Company FAQ
Careers
Worldwide
Newsletter
Contact Us
Community
Grid for non scale
Post a reply
Username:
Subject:
Confirmation code:
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive, there is no zero.
Font colour:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Smilies
BBCode
is
ON
[img] is
ON
[flash] is
OFF
[url] is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Topic review
[quote="praire_ck"]Does L-EDIT work acceptably well with the very fine-grid resolutions typical of deep-nanoscale layout.[/quote]
Options
Disable BBCode
Disable smilies
Do not automatically parse URLs
Expand view
Topic review: Grid for non scale
Quote LannyL
Re: Grid for non scale
by
LannyL
» Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:23 pm
While the L-EDIT layout grid can be set to any conventional layout grid, it is sometimes helpful in deep nanoscale analog CMOS designs to not always use minimum grid settings or minimum design rules. Some examples of these instances include minimum metal spacing, contact-to-gate spacing, gate extension, etc. If the combination of coarser-than-minimum grid and more restrictive design rules can be used, the layout is less prone to DRC errors and some of the complex 2D design rules can be eliminated. In such case it is helpful for the designer to create a more-restrictive rule set than the minimum design rules permit. The creation of custom restrictive design rules is now being recommended for deep nanoscale CMOS designs by several authors. As is now well understood, ‘DRC correct’ no longer ensures manufacturability.
While the L-EDIT layout grid can be set to any conventional layout grid, it is sometimes helpful in deep nanoscale analog CMOS designs to not always use minimum grid settings or minimum design rules. Some examples of these instances include minimum metal spacing, contact-to-gate spacing, gate extension, etc. If the combination of coarser-than-minimum grid and more restrictive design rules can be used, the layout is less prone to DRC errors and some of the complex 2D design rules can be eliminated. In such case it is helpful for the designer to create a more-restrictive rule set than the minimum design rules permit. The creation of custom restrictive design rules is now being recommended for deep nanoscale CMOS designs by several authors. As is now well understood, ‘DRC correct’ no longer ensures manufacturability.
Quote praire_ck
Grid for non scale
by
praire_ck
» Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:19 pm
Does L-EDIT work acceptably well with the very fine-grid resolutions typical of deep-nanoscale layout.
Does L-EDIT work acceptably well with the very fine-grid resolutions typical of deep-nanoscale layout.
Top
Main Menu
View unanswered posts
View active topics
View your posts
User Menu
FAQ
Register
Login
Back to Top
Login Form
Remember Me